I know this blog was intended to document my formal learning with CSU, but I'm finding it to be a useful place to write down my reflections. I'm noticing lately that a lot of my reflections are about topics of my own interest that I've encountered through my own reading. I'm getting a little addicted to this, as I am finding the idea of learning through my own network to be pretty inspiring!

So today I was reading MindShift, and Audrey Watters addressed the topic of alternatives to formal education. This relates to the topic I wrote about a few days ago, when I was "sidetracked." She states, "Add to that the wealth of educational resources now available online, the possibility for people to learn new skills and to gain new knowledge outside of the traditional college classroom seems to be a compelling argument not to head right back to school."

In this blog posting she mentioned several resources, but I checked out the Edupunk's Guide by Anya Kamanetz. "An edupunk is someone who doesn't want to play by the old college rules." This website is filled with tutorials, resources and a free ebook guide for people who want to get an education, but want to do it on their own. She has also created a book called DIY U, and facilitates a self-learning community on P2P U (among other things). 

The idea of directing your own learning has really become a fascinating topic to me. I'm quite interested in learning more about this idea of self-education because I'm not done. I'm nearing the end of my Masters degree, and I feel like I've just begun. I want to learn more about this topic, as I imagine I can be a valuable resource to colleagues at my school (as the librarian) in guiding them to pursue their own interests. Hmmm, maybe there could even be a job somewhere one day for me in this? I know Anya is going on maternity leave shortly and is looking for someone to take on the community manager work in DIY U. I like the idea, but I'm also strapped with two children and a Masters degree in progress.

Anyway, yes, back to self-education. My mind has drifted a little (as you can see) but the exciting thing is that I'm getting a glimpse of yet another job of the future (or maybe a job of today that not many know about) that doesn't yet have any formal training. Professional Development Coordinator? Professional Learning Facilitator? Would this be an alternative for many from formal university education? Would this fulfill requirements to become a teacher, or librarian in the future (probably not if governments have to issue credentials for working in that capacity, like they do in California). 

Watters made a very good point at the end of her article though. "Despite the financial burden and the time commitment, college does offer an infrastructure - ideally at least - to make this learning happen." This is true for now. However, as organizations like P2PU, Khan Academy, and University of the People continue to appear, surely it's just a matter of time before we have cheaper, more self-directed options that do have an infrastructure (UoP does), and maybe even will have formal recognition. Paul states, "We’re entering an era in which elite education is cheap, but elite credentials are increasingly — for most, prohibitively — expensive."

So now that my interest  is that I need time to explore these exciting new topics. Where does that come from? OK, back to finishing my paper... (ugh)

Kamanetz, A. (2011). The Edupunks's Guide. Available from http://edupunksguide.org/

P2PU: http://p2pu.org/en/

Paul, A. (2011). Salman Khan: The New Andrew Carnegie? Available from http://ideas.time.com/2011/11/16/salman-kahn-the-new-andrew-carnegie/

University of the People: http://www.uopeople.org/

Watters, A. (2011). Considering College During a Recession? Think Again. Available from http://mindshift.kqed.org/2011/11/considering-college-during-a-recession-think-again/
 
This is an imitation of the Common Craft "in Plain English" videos. Very clever!
 
So today was meant to be spent working on my paper for my professional placement. I have done so much professional reading recently and have learned so much--the challenge is remembering where the heck I got my information. So, as I write, I'm jumping back into the university library's website searching databases for articles that support the point I want to make. I know, it's a bit backwards, and is not meant to be done that way. Ssshhhh, don't tell anyone. I need the reference for my paper.

Anyway, as I'm searching, I encounter an article by Michael Stephens, called the Transparent Library School. He was a keynote speaker at the Learning 2.011 Worldwide Virtual Conference I participated in a month ago, so I read it (one of the many ways I get sidetracked when studying!). In it, he mentions a blog by an MLIS student named Ben Lainhart, who is frustrated about the instructional pedagogy used for his MLIS program. The quote made me laugh. "I do not want to take any more online classes that are exactly the same: sign into BB (BlackBoard), read the 'lecture,' read the articles, make my obligatory posts on the discussion board and occasionally write a paper. How uninspiring!" I could not agree more.

Sorry CSU, but many of the courses I've taken so far have been delivered this way. This element of my studies has been disappointing. However, this is not to say that I haven't learned anything. I do the necessary assignments and follow instructions carefully (and frankly, I think I've doing a pretty good job so far too). However, I learn most when I'm off track. The learning that sticks with me most, the stuff that gets me excited about jumping into this job as teacher-librarian has more to do with the professionals in the industry that I have encountered along the way. I enjoy learning from those in the job now, who are doing things that guide rest of us. When I see that, I want to learn too. No, I don't get particularly jazzed about reading about philosophies and practices from a text and making those posts to the discussion forums because I have to.

That being said, what is the answer? I am with Ben Lainhart who said: "... I don’t have too many answers yet. All I have is a feeling that things can and should be done differently. The problem is: differently may be something so open-source that it really begins to mean the end of “institutional” education. And I do not think that I have a problem with that."

Just to add to that further, I encountered a youtube video of a presentation by Jeff Utecht, who I remember used to be an IT teacher here in China. In this speech, "Community Trumps Content" he talked about the power of communities. "The Revolution will be here when the students figure out they can learn more in their own communities than they can sitting in a seat in the school." I can relate. He then mentions a university called The University of the People which offers degrees for $25 around the world. Maybe this University of the People is what Ben Lainhart is talking about.

But then again, I suppose these resources not necessarily academic. I need to get back to that paper, and find that reference. Ugh.

Lainhart, B. (2011). Is Online Education Still Stuck in 2001: Some still unformed thoughts. Available from http://benjaminlainhart.com/2011/02/17/is-online-education-still-stuck-in-2001-some-still-unformed-thoughts/
Stephens, M. (2011). The Transparent Library School. Library Journal, 136(9), 46
Utecht, J. (2010). Community Trumps Content. Available from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8djV8slDN0